The new mail-in voting requirements can be enforced for now, while another Trump-backed proposal seeks to require identification and proof of citizenship in federal elections.

The Donald Trump administration can move forward, for now, with new mail-in voting rules after two court decisions removed earlier blocks.

  • Why it matters: The rulings did not declare the measures legal. With the November 3 elections approaching, new lawsuits could halt them again.

Rulings Allow the Mail-i Voting Rules to Take Effect but Do Not Uphold Them

SAVE ACT, VOTE, trump, latino, mail, trum, Trump mail-in voting rules
Trump Mail-In Voting Rules and Other Key Points in the New Election Battle – PHOTO: Referential image created with AI

Federal Judge Indira Talwani on Wednesday lifted an order that had prevented the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from enforcing its new requirements.

Two days earlier, the Supreme Court had removed another block because the states filed their lawsuit before USPS published its final regulation.

  • The limitation: Neither ruling decided whether Trump or USPS has the legal authority to impose these changes. The plaintiffs may seek new orders to block them.

The rule requires election officials to provide USPS with the names and addresses of mail-in voters through a new federal system.

Ballot envelopes will have to use unique barcodes, and their designs will need to be reviewed by the Postal Service.

Mailings that fail verification could be rejected.

Trump Seeks Tougher Identification and Citizenship Requirements

Trump’s election push goes beyond mail-in voting. His administration also supports the SAVE America Act, a legislative proposal that is separate from the executive order.

The House of Representatives approved a version in February requiring documentary proof of citizenship when registering and identification to vote in federal elections.

  • The difference: Trump’s order seeks changes through federal agencies; the SAVE America Act must become law through Congress.

The White House and Republicans argue that these measures would help prevent ineligible people from voting and increase confidence in election results.

Democrats Denounce Restrictions and Government Overreach

Opponents argue that the new requirements could prevent eligible voters from receiving their ballots because of administrative mistakes, technical problems or delays.

A coalition of state attorneys general filed a new lawsuit against the final USPS regulation, arguing that it infringes on states’ constitutional powers.

  • The dispute: California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the rule an “illegal abuse of power” and accused Trump of trying to “control elections.”

USPS, by contrast, says the rules will improve ballot tracking and reduce fraud risks without determining who is eligible to vote.

Trump Mail-In Voting Rules Could Quickly Return to Court

The conflict now enters a decisive stage because states can directly challenge the final regulation, which did not previously exist.

Voting rights groups have also amended their lawsuit to challenge those final rules.

  • What comes next: Courts will have to decide who has the authority to impose these requirements and whether the Trump mail-in voting rules should be blocked again before November 3.

The underlying legal question remains unresolved: how much power the federal executive branch can exercise over elections that are administered primarily by the states, under rules that Congress can also regulate.

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN: Republicans Lose Ground: 59% of Hispanics Lean Democratic in November

SOURCE: EFE / CNBC / American Progress